<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Warming News Blog: Climate Change Effects, Issues, Causes, Solutions and More &#187; Consensus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/tag/consensus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com</link>
	<description>daily global warming news: effects, issues, causes, solutions, opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ExxonSecrets &#124; Greenpeace USA</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6911/exxonsecrets-greenpeace-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6911/exxonsecrets-greenpeace-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxonsecrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace Usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urgency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/environment/ExxonSecrets_Greenpeace_USA</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ExxonSecrets is a Greenpeace research project highlighting the more than a decade-long campaign to deny the urgency of the scientific consensus on global warming and delay action to fix the problem.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6911/exxonsecrets-greenpeace-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Randi, trips over global warming skepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6758/james-randi-trips-over-global-warming-skepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6758/james-randi-trips-over-global-warming-skepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Randi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/environment/James_Randi_trips_over_global_warming_skepticism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antiscience &#124; Noted skeptic James Randi recently expressed doubt over the consensus that humans are causing global warming. A flood of corrections and comment has led him to clarify that he was expressing his own confusion over the meaning of this warming and not discounting the overwhelming scientific evidence. Storm abated...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6758/james-randi-trips-over-global-warming-skepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There May Be a Consensus &#8211; Just Not The One You Were Told</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6666/there-may-be-a-consensus-just-not-the-one-you-were-told/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6666/there-may-be-a-consensus-just-not-the-one-you-were-told/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/world_news/There_May_Be_a_Consensus_Just_Not_The_One_You_Were_Told</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using their own numbers, the warmmongers keep saying that there are 2,500 scientists who still believe in global warming. On the other hand 31,000 scientists have signed a petition saying that they don't believe in global warming.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6666/there-may-be-a-consensus-just-not-the-one-you-were-told/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does cold weather disprove global warming? No!</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6626/does-cold-weather-disprove-global-warming-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6626/does-cold-weather-disprove-global-warming-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitive Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Does_cold_weather_disprove_global_warming_No</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is always fun to watch "conservatives" argue with the scientific consensus. Scientists have years and years of definitive research to back them up, "conservatives" simply point out that they had to wear a hat to work.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6626/does-cold-weather-disprove-global-warming-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics: The Climate Lie &#8211; AND Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6480/politics-the-climate-lie-and-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6480/politics-the-climate-lie-and-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Politics_The_Climate_Lie_AND_Magazine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite protestations to the contrary, the science on global warming is not settled. There is no “consensus,” and there never was.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6480/politics-the-climate-lie-and-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoaxenhagen Day 5: Scientific Consensus by force.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6459/hoaxenhagen-day-5-scientific-consensus-by-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6459/hoaxenhagen-day-5-scientific-consensus-by-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/politics/Hoaxenhagen_Day_5_Scientific_Consensus_by_force</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of ClimateGate and the exposure of the Religon of Global Warming as the Largest Scam/Hoax/money grab/myth in history...the Green Nazis have adopted one universal response to ClimateGate--Deny and Ignore.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6459/hoaxenhagen-day-5-scientific-consensus-by-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate Shifting out the Truth VS. non scientific spin</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6369/climategate-shifting-out-the-truth-vs-non-scientific-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6369/climategate-shifting-out-the-truth-vs-non-scientific-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/environment/Climategate_Shifting_out_the_Truth_VS_non_scientific_spin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hacked e-mails show climate scientists in a bad light but don't change scientific consensus on global warming. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6369/climategate-shifting-out-the-truth-vs-non-scientific-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCIENCE AS RELIGION &#8211; Yahoo! News</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6313/science-as-religion-yahoo-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6313/science-as-religion-yahoo-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attempts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/politics/SCIENCE_AS_RELIGION_Yahoo_News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What can we learn from Climategate -- i.e., the scandal in which hacked e-mails revealed apparent attempts by official climate scientists to manufacture a consensus on global warming by fudging with the data and punishing dissidents?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6313/science-as-religion-yahoo-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change: The Global Media Presents an Apocalyptic Sce</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6249/climate-change-the-global-media-presents-an-apocalyptic-sce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6249/climate-change-the-global-media-presents-an-apocalyptic-sce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers Around The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Public Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/world_news/Climate_Change_The_Global_Media_Presents_an_Apocalyptic_Sce</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following text (in annex) was published simultaneously by major Newspapers around the World. It constitutes a Worldwide public relations initiative, intended to sway public opinion into unreservedly accepting the "Global Warming consensus". The text of the editorial was prepared by The Guardian team.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6249/climate-change-the-global-media-presents-an-apocalyptic-sce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming Petition revisited &#8211; so much for consensus</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6117/global-warming-petition-revisited-so-much-for-consensus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6117/global-warming-petition-revisited-so-much-for-consensus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digg RSS Search for global warming</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Chemists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digg.com/environment/Global_Warming_Petition_revisited_so_much_for_consensus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Petition Project was organized by a group of physicists and physical chemists who conduct scientific research at several American scientific institutions. The petition statement and the signatures of its 31,486 signers, however, speak for themselves. The primary relevant role of the organizers is that they are among the 9,029 PhD signers...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/6117/global-warming-petition-revisited-so-much-for-consensus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
